Coverart for item
The Resource 2013 federal sequestration : analyses of planning, implementation and effects, Hailie Fox, editor

2013 federal sequestration : analyses of planning, implementation and effects, Hailie Fox, editor

Label
2013 federal sequestration : analyses of planning, implementation and effects
Title
2013 federal sequestration
Title remainder
analyses of planning, implementation and effects
Statement of responsibility
Hailie Fox, editor
Contributor
Subject
Language
eng
Summary
On March 1, 2013, pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, the President ordered an across-the-board cancellation of budgetary resources, known as sequestration, to achieve 85.3 billion in reductions across federal government accounts. Under current law, a sequestration of direct spending will occur through fiscal year 2024 and another sequestration of discretionary appropriations could occur in any fiscal year through 2021. This book examines the effects of fiscal year 2013 sequestration on agency operations, performance, or services to the public; how agenci
Member of
Dewey number
336/.012
Index
index present
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
dictionaries
http://library.link/vocab/relatedWorkOrContributorName
Fox, Hailie,
Series statement
Economic issues, problems and perspectives
http://library.link/vocab/subjectName
  • Sequestration (Public finance)
  • Government spending policy
  • United States
Label
2013 federal sequestration : analyses of planning, implementation and effects, Hailie Fox, editor
Instantiates
Publication
Copyright
Note
  • Includes index
  • Title from PDF title page (viewed on Sept. 26, 2014)
Antecedent source
unknown
Color
multicolored
Contents
  • 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data; CONTENTS; PREFACE; Chapter 1: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING CERTAIN ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; AGENCIES' ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO SEQUESTRATION RESULTED IN A RANGE OF IMMEDIATE AND LONGER-TERM EFFECTS
  • Most agencies began formal planning for sequestration in 2012 while continued uncertainty delayed decisions regarding resource allocationagencies used funding flexibilities and congress took actions to mitigate some effects on core mission while still achieving sequestration reductions; conclusion; recommendations for executive action; agency comments and our evaluation; overview of sequestration at 23 federal agencies; u.s. department of agriculture; department of commerce; agency comments; department of defense; department of education; department of energy
  • Department of health and human servicesdepartment of homeland security; department of housing and urban development; u.s. department of the interior; department of justice; department of labor; department of state and u.s. agency for international development operations and foreign assistance; department of transportation; department of the treasury; u.s. environmental protection agency; general services administration; national aeronautics and space administration; national science foundation; nuclear regulatory commission; office of personnel management; small business administration
  • SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONAPPENDIX I. OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY; APPENDIX II. GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS; Chapter 2: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: SELECTED FEDERAL AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING SHORT-TERM ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; SEQUESTRATION REDUCED SELECTED FEDERAL COMPONENTS' SERVICES TO THE PUBLIC AND INCREASED SOME PARTNERS' AND RECIPIENTS' RELIANCE ON OTHER FUNDING SOURCES
  • Federal components' sequestration planning and implementation efforts varied and were hindered by uncertainty and other challengesconcluding observations; agency comments and our evaluation; appendix i. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at u.s. customs and border protection; appendix ii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the centers for medicare & medicaid services; appendix iii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of elementary and secondary education; appendix iv. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of public and indian housing; appendix v. objectives, scope, and methodology
Control code
ocn891388154
Dimensions
unknown
Extent
1 online resource
File format
unknown
Form of item
online
Isbn
9781633218000
Level of compression
unknown
Note
eBooks on EBSCOhost
Quality assurance targets
not applicable
Reformatting quality
unknown
Sound
unknown sound
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
(OCoLC)891388154
Label
2013 federal sequestration : analyses of planning, implementation and effects, Hailie Fox, editor
Publication
Copyright
Note
  • Includes index
  • Title from PDF title page (viewed on Sept. 26, 2014)
Antecedent source
unknown
Color
multicolored
Contents
  • 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; 2013 FEDERAL SEQUESTRATION: ANALYSES OF PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND EFFECTS; Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data; CONTENTS; PREFACE; Chapter 1: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING CERTAIN ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; AGENCIES' ACTIONS IN RESPONSE TO SEQUESTRATION RESULTED IN A RANGE OF IMMEDIATE AND LONGER-TERM EFFECTS
  • Most agencies began formal planning for sequestration in 2012 while continued uncertainty delayed decisions regarding resource allocationagencies used funding flexibilities and congress took actions to mitigate some effects on core mission while still achieving sequestration reductions; conclusion; recommendations for executive action; agency comments and our evaluation; overview of sequestration at 23 federal agencies; u.s. department of agriculture; department of commerce; agency comments; department of defense; department of education; department of energy
  • Department of health and human servicesdepartment of homeland security; department of housing and urban development; u.s. department of the interior; department of justice; department of labor; department of state and u.s. agency for international development operations and foreign assistance; department of transportation; department of the treasury; u.s. environmental protection agency; general services administration; national aeronautics and space administration; national science foundation; nuclear regulatory commission; office of personnel management; small business administration
  • SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONAPPENDIX I. OBJECTIVES, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY; APPENDIX II. GLOSSARY OF BUDGET TERMS; Chapter 2: 2013 SEQUESTRATION: SELECTED FEDERAL AGENCIES REDUCED SOME SERVICES AND INVESTMENTS, WHILE TAKING SHORT-TERM ACTIONS TO MITIGATE EFFECTS; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; SEQUESTRATION REDUCED SELECTED FEDERAL COMPONENTS' SERVICES TO THE PUBLIC AND INCREASED SOME PARTNERS' AND RECIPIENTS' RELIANCE ON OTHER FUNDING SOURCES
  • Federal components' sequestration planning and implementation efforts varied and were hindered by uncertainty and other challengesconcluding observations; agency comments and our evaluation; appendix i. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at u.s. customs and border protection; appendix ii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the centers for medicare & medicaid services; appendix iii. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of elementary and secondary education; appendix iv. fiscal year 2013 sequestration at the office of public and indian housing; appendix v. objectives, scope, and methodology
Control code
ocn891388154
Dimensions
unknown
Extent
1 online resource
File format
unknown
Form of item
online
Isbn
9781633218000
Level of compression
unknown
Note
eBooks on EBSCOhost
Quality assurance targets
not applicable
Reformatting quality
unknown
Sound
unknown sound
Specific material designation
remote
System control number
(OCoLC)891388154

Library Locations

    • InternetBorrow it
      Albany, Auckland, 0632, NZ
Processing Feedback ...